The documentation you are viewing is for Dapr v1.1 which is an older version of Dapr. For up-to-date documentation, see the latest version.
State management overview
Using state management, your application can store data as key/value pairs in the supported state stores.
When using state management your application can leverage features that would otherwise be complicated and error-prone to build yourself such as:
- Distributed concurrency and data consistency
- Bulk CRUD operations
Your application can use Dapr’s state management API to save and read key/value pairs using a state store component, as shown in the diagram below. For example, by using HTTP POST you can save key/value pairs and by using HTTP GET you can read a key and have its value returned.
Pluggable state stores
Dapr data stores are modeled as components, which can be swapped out without any changes to your service code. See supported state stores to see the list.
Configurable state store behavior
Dapr allows developers to attach additional metadata to a state operation request that describes how the request is expected to be handled. You can attach:
- Concurrency requirements
- Consistency requirements
By default, your application should assume a data store is eventually consistent and uses a last-write-wins concurrency pattern.
Not all stores are created equal. To ensure portability of your application you can query the capabilities of the store and make your code adaptive to different store capabilities.
Dapr supports optimistic concurrency control (OCC) using ETags. When a state is requested, Dapr always attaches an ETag property to the returned state. When the user code tries to update or delete a state, it’s expected to attach the ETag either through the request body for updates or the
If-Match header for deletes. The write operation can succeed only when the provided ETag matches with the ETag in the state store.
Dapr chooses OCC because in many applications, data update conflicts are rare because clients are naturally partitioned by business contexts to operate on different data. However, if your application chooses to use ETags, a request may get rejected because of mismatched ETags. It’s recommended that you use a retry policy to compensate for such conflicts when using ETags.
If your application omits ETags in writing requests, Dapr skips ETag checks while handling the requests. This essentially enables the last-write-wins pattern, compared to the first-write-wins pattern with ETags.
Note on ETagsFor stores that don’t natively support ETags, it’s expected that the corresponding Dapr state store implementation simulates ETags and follows the Dapr state management API specification when handling states. Because Dapr state store implementations are technically clients to the underlying data store, such simulation should be straightforward using the concurrency control mechanisms provided by the store.
Read the API reference to learn how to set concurrency options.
Dapr supports both strong consistency and eventual consistency, with eventual consistency as the default behavior.
When strong consistency is used, Dapr waits for all replicas (or designated quorums) to acknowledge before it acknowledges a write request. When eventual consistency is used, Dapr returns as soon as the write request is accepted by the underlying data store, even if this is a single replica.
Read the API reference to learn how to set consistency options.
Dapr supports two types of bulk operations - bulk or multi. You can group several requests of the same type into a bulk (or a batch). Dapr submits requests in the bulk as individual requests to the underlying data store. In other words, bulk operations are not transactional. On the other hand, you can group requests of different types into a multi-operation, which is handled as an atomic transaction.
Read the API reference to learn how use bulk and multi options.
Transactional state stores can be used to store actor state. To specify which state store to be used for actors, specify value of property
true in the metadata section of the state store component. Actors state is stored with a specific scheme in transactional state stores, which allows for consistent querying. Read the API reference to learn more about state stores for actors and the actors API reference
Query state store directly
Dapr saves and retrieves state values without any transformation. You can query and aggregate state directly from the underlying state store.
For example, to get all state keys associated with an application ID “myApp” in Redis, use:
Querying actor state
If the data store supports SQL queries, you can query an actor’s state using SQL queries. For example use:
SELECT * FROM StateTable WHERE Id='<app-id>||<actor-type>||<actor-id>||<key>'
You can also perform aggregate queries across actor instances, avoiding the common turn-based concurrency limitations of actor frameworks. For example, to calculate the average temperature of all thermometer actors, use:
SELECT AVG(value) FROM StateTable WHERE Id LIKE '<app-id>||<thermometer>||*||temperature'
Note on direct queriesDirect queries of the state store are not governed by Dapr concurrency control, since you are not calling through the Dapr runtime. What you see are snapshots of committed data which are acceptable for read-only queries across multiple actors, however writes should be done via the Dapr state management or actors APIs.
State management API
The API for state management can be found in the state management API reference which describes how to retrieve, save and delete state values by providing keys.
- Follow these guides on:
- Try out the hello world quickstart which shows how to use state management or try the samples in the Dapr SDKs
- List of state store components
- Read the state management API reference
- Read the actors API reference